>On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 19:32:35 +0400 >Jason <[email protected]> wrote:
> Groovy ? Grunge ? Same thing ;) If you say so! > ALl fonts convert to the same format for me on my system - the one with > the navigation system for looking at the font letters with a scroll > system. For me, that's the way a straight use of font2swf dishes them out, namely width: 1024.00, and height: 768.00 at SWF Version 8. One long horizontal line of all the characters in the font. Select a character and a larger preview of that individual character chosen is displayed underneath the line. Use of swfcombine with -F to change the SWF version produces no appreciable difference, i.e. same file format, same file size, same width and height. The addition of the FileAttributes Tag doesn't add much overhead, after all. The ONLY change I *have* noticed, is when stating -F 10. With certain fonts I get the AS3 bit set inside the FileAttributes Tag, with others that simply doesn't happen. There's the puzzlement. One for which a gander at the old source code might provide an answer. As to what you are doing to your fonts? Pass!! ;o) > I imagine that system s what it bigger filesize compared to yours. I'd have to look a lot closer at the byte code of the grunge font you sent back to me. Definitely different to that which I sent to you! Why, as I've already said, I'm not sure. Needs a keener eye maybe. > I also imagine that the code for that scrolling system is AS1 or AS2 and > that is preventing it being AVM2 As far as I can tell, it is merely a matter of setting the AS3 bit on the file. There appears to be no AS2/AS3 code in there whatsoever. > Any idea what the setting is for NOT having the presentation / scrolling > script ? I think that is the key If you didn't have it, how would you display them? Besides, it's just a simple conversion to SWF so as you can use the font characters in whatever swf you need them. Regards, Chris.
