For me an objection to xfailing this is that it really isn't an expected fail. Linux is actually broken.
> On Apr 22, 2016, at 10:46 AM, Daniel Dunbar via swift-dev > <swift-dev@swift.org> wrote: > > I saw that, my question is specifically how this is going to be resolved. We > shouldn't have failures on the bots with no short term plan. > > Are there objections to XFAILing this test until resolved? > > - Daniel > >> On Apr 21, 2016, at 10:36 PM, Greg Parker <gpar...@apple.com >> <mailto:gpar...@apple.com>> wrote: >> >> >>> On Apr 21, 2016, at 9:20 PM, Daniel Dunbar via swift-dev >>> <swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>> wrote: >>> >>> What is the status of the Ubuntu packages CI failure: >>> swift-package-tests :: repl/test-repl-glibc.py >>> >>> It has been failing for a while now and I would like to get back to being >>> able to use @swift-ci please test and merge. >> >> https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-1109 <https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-1109> >> >> >> -- >> Greg Parker gpar...@apple.com <mailto:gpar...@apple.com> Runtime >> Wrangler >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > swift-dev mailing list > swift-dev@swift.org > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev
_______________________________________________ swift-dev mailing list swift-dev@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev
