> On Apr 22, 2016, at 11:09 AM, William Dillon via swift-dev > <swift-dev@swift.org> wrote: > For me an objection to xfailing this is that it really isn't an expected > fail. Linux is actually broken.
And it's therefore expected to fail until we fix it. Ideally, whoever added this understands that it's their responsibility to implement it on Linux, too. John. > >> On Apr 22, 2016, at 10:46 AM, Daniel Dunbar via swift-dev >> <swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>> wrote: >> >> I saw that, my question is specifically how this is going to be resolved. We >> shouldn't have failures on the bots with no short term plan. >> >> Are there objections to XFAILing this test until resolved? >> >> - Daniel >> >>> On Apr 21, 2016, at 10:36 PM, Greg Parker <gpar...@apple.com >>> <mailto:gpar...@apple.com>> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On Apr 21, 2016, at 9:20 PM, Daniel Dunbar via swift-dev >>>> <swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>> wrote: >>>> >>>> What is the status of the Ubuntu packages CI failure: >>>> swift-package-tests :: repl/test-repl-glibc.py >>>> >>>> It has been failing for a while now and I would like to get back to being >>>> able to use @swift-ci please test and merge. >>> >>> https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-1109 >>> <https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-1109> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Greg Parker gpar...@apple.com <mailto:gpar...@apple.com> Runtime >>> Wrangler >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> swift-dev mailing list >> swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org> >> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev > > _______________________________________________ > swift-dev mailing list > swift-dev@swift.org > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev
_______________________________________________ swift-dev mailing list swift-dev@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev
