Le 21 déc. 2015 à 21:34, Dave Abrahams via swift-evolution <swift-evolution@swift.org> a écrit :
> I’m actually coming around to wanting it to be just “type” as a contextual > keyword, if we can make that work. The point is that these types aren’t > “associated” in any way that distinguishes them from other requirements on > nested declarations, i.e. funcs and vars. Could also use `typename`. But maybe that's too easy to mix with `typealias`. -- Michel Fortin michel.for...@michelf.ca https://michelf.ca _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
