> On Dec 22, 2015, at 8:42 PM, Brent Royal-Gordon <br...@architechies.com> > wrote: > >> You shouldn’t have to say myProperty.lazy.backingStore.clear(), just >> myProperty.lazy.clear(). >> >> I don’t know where that leaves us :-) > > I wonder if these should all just be flattened into the instance that owns > the property. So instead of saying foo.myProperty.lazy.clear(), you just say > foo.clearMyProperty() or some such. That approach isn't very principled, but > it *is* very convenient.
I agree that "myProperty.clear()" is very appealing, but it has the potential to be confusing when behavior methods are shadowed by members of the front-facing property. You'd still need a way to unambiguously refer to behavior methods when they're shadowed too. -Joe _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
