> On Mar 24, 2016, at 11:09 AM, Colin Barrett via swift-evolution 
> <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
> 
> The proposal is unclear to me in what it is, er, proposing. The motivation 
> section speaks about allow `let` to be used as argument label, but the 
> proposed solution says that func foo(let x: Int) { … } would be an error. 
> That seems like it’s contrary to the motivations of the proposal.

The proposal is simply that "func foo(let x: Int) { … }” be disallowed, since 
it is redundant with "func foo(x: Int) { … }”.  In terms of taking back “let” 
as a parameter label, this only makes sense in the future, when we give up on 
migration of the former into the later.

At that point, let could conceivably be used as an external label, as in 
"foo(let: 42)”.  This would make the language simpler and more consistent, 
since we allow other keywords there.

-Chris

> 
> -Colin
> 
>> On Mar 24, 2016, at 2:00 PM, Chris Lattner <clatt...@apple.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello Swift community,
>> 
>> The review of "Remove explicit use of let from Function Parameters" begins 
>> now and runs through March 27th. The proposal is available here:
>> 
>>      
>> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0053-remove-let-from-function-parameters.md
>> 
>> Reviews are an important part of the Swift evolution process. All reviews 
>> should be sent to the swift-evolution mailing list at:
>>      https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>> or, if you would like to keep your feedback private, directly to the review 
>> manager.
>> 
>> 
>> What goes into a review?
>> 
>> The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review 
>> through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of 
>> Swift. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to 
>> answer in your review:
>> 
>>      * What is your evaluation of the proposal?
>>      * Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change 
>> to Swift?
>>      * Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift?
>>      * If you have you used other languages or libraries with a similar 
>> feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
>>      * How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick 
>> reading, or an in-depth study?
>> 
>> More information about the Swift evolution process is available at
>> 
>>      https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/process.md
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> 
>> -Chris Lattner
>> Review Manager
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-evolution-announce mailing list
>> swift-evolution-annou...@swift.org
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution-announce
> 
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution@swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to