Okay, great. That makes sense, thanks for clarifying Chris. 

-Colin (via thumbs)

> On Mar 25, 2016, at 12:35 AM, Chris Lattner <clatt...@apple.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Mar 24, 2016, at 11:09 AM, Colin Barrett via swift-evolution 
>> <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
>> 
>> The proposal is unclear to me in what it is, er, proposing. The motivation 
>> section speaks about allow `let` to be used as argument label, but the 
>> proposed solution says that func foo(let x: Int) { … } would be an error. 
>> That seems like it’s contrary to the motivations of the proposal.
> 
> The proposal is simply that "func foo(let x: Int) { … }” be disallowed, since 
> it is redundant with "func foo(x: Int) { … }”.  In terms of taking back “let” 
> as a parameter label, this only makes sense in the future, when we give up on 
> migration of the former into the later.
> 
> At that point, let could conceivably be used as an external label, as in 
> "foo(let: 42)”.  This would make the language simpler and more consistent, 
> since we allow other keywords there.
> 
> -Chris
> 
>> 
>> -Colin
>> 
>>> On Mar 24, 2016, at 2:00 PM, Chris Lattner <clatt...@apple.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hello Swift community,
>>> 
>>> The review of "Remove explicit use of let from Function Parameters" begins 
>>> now and runs through March 27th. The proposal is available here:
>>> 
>>>    
>>> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0053-remove-let-from-function-parameters.md
>>> 
>>> Reviews are an important part of the Swift evolution process. All reviews 
>>> should be sent to the swift-evolution mailing list at:
>>>    https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>>> or, if you would like to keep your feedback private, directly to the review 
>>> manager.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> What goes into a review?
>>> 
>>> The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review 
>>> through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of 
>>> Swift. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to 
>>> answer in your review:
>>> 
>>>    * What is your evaluation of the proposal?
>>>    * Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change 
>>> to Swift?
>>>    * Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift?
>>>    * If you have you used other languages or libraries with a similar 
>>> feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
>>>    * How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick 
>>> reading, or an in-depth study?
>>> 
>>> More information about the Swift evolution process is available at
>>> 
>>>    https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/process.md
>>> 
>>> Thank you,
>>> 
>>> -Chris Lattner
>>> Review Manager
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> swift-evolution-announce mailing list
>>> swift-evolution-annou...@swift.org
>>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution-announce
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-evolution mailing list
>> swift-evolution@swift.org
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
> 
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to