> > * What is your evaluation of the proposal? The IUO is not a transitional technology, as it is essential to bridge from languages from which Swift evolved, such as C and Objective-C. The proposal doesn't give much consideration to this application of IUOs, and hence, I cannot support the proposal in its current state.
> * Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change > to Swift? Grant it, the use of IUO outside of bridging is strange and probably a poor practice. However, there seems to exist a requirement and this proposal would make satisfying this requirement more difficult. > * Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift? No. > * If you have you used other languages or libraries with a similar > feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those? Not applicable. > * How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick > reading, or an in-depth study? In-depth study. _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
