> On Apr 6, 2016, at 17:13, Brent Royal-Gordon via swift-evolution 
> <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
> 
> Another nice thing about this style is that, in principle, I think it could 
> be extended to specify requirements on non-type parameter values.

I had this thought too.  The possibilities that this syntax change suggests for 
compile time evaluation are very interesting, in my opinion.

-Matt

_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to