> Pattern binding for optionals will look like:
>
> if let x? = y { ... }
I suggested precisely this in February. The core team shot it down:
> We tried this* and got a lot of negative feedback. Optionals are unwrapped
> too often for people to be comfortable writing "if let name? =
> optionalCondition".
https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/Week-of-Mon-20160201/008964.html
Having said that, this still seems like a good idea to me, but they're the ones
with implementation experience; all I have is an elegant idea.
--
Brent Royal-Gordon
Architechies
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
