> On May 20, 2016, at 10:48 AM, Erica Sadun <er...@ericasadun.com> wrote: > > >> On May 20, 2016, at 11:43 AM, Chris Lattner <clatt...@apple.com> wrote: >> >> >>> On May 20, 2016, at 10:41 AM, Erica Sadun <er...@ericasadun.com> wrote: >>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Right, but the catfight had a clear outcome: >>>>>> >>>>>> 1) keywords are conjoined >>>>>> 2) attributes are lower camel cased. >>>>>> 3) attributes should use “non” not “no”. noescape should be nonescaping >>>>>> (and thus no camel bump). >>>>> >>>>> Would you be in favor of a proposal that cleans all of this up at once >>>>> and establishes this standard for all new features? I don't mind the >>>>> change and think consistency is a good idea, I just think it doesn't make >>>>> sense to keep doing these as one-off changes. >>>> >>>> I’d prefer one proposal to cover didset/willset and one to cover >>>> nonescaping (and any other nofoo attributes left). They will raise >>>> different sorts of discussion, even though they both seem obvious to me. >>> >>> Before putting together a proposal, are there any other de-facto rules >>> besides the three already listed that touch on naming keywords and >>> attributes? (I suppose no snake case is a given) >> >> I think that these are the relevant rules. As I mentioned upthread, >> .dynamicType is broken for a different reason, and thus leads to a different >> solution (it should be a global function in the stdlib, not a propery). >> >> -Chris > > > Separate action items: > > * Move dynamicType to standard library as a global function > * Rename didSet and willSet to lowercase to conform to Swift standard of > conjoined lowercase keywords.
Sounds great. > * Rename noescape to nonescaping to conform to Swift standard of > "non"-modified attributes I just looked and the one other wrong one we have is “noreturn”. It would be great to tackle nonescaping and whatever noreturn should be in the same proposal. Thanks Erica! -Chris _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution