Agreed!

Sent from my iPhone

> On 28 May 2016, at 08:10, L. Mihalkovic via swift-evolution 
> <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On May 28, 2016, at 2:30 AM, Erica Sadun via swift-evolution 
>> <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>>> On May 27, 2016, at 6:26 PM, Brent Royal-Gordon <br...@architechies.com> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> guard
>>>> x == 0 && a == b && c == d &&
>>>> let y = optional, w = optional2, v = optional 3 &&
>>>> z == 2
>>>> else { ... }
>>>> 
>>>> Figuring out where to break the first line into expression and into 
>>>> condition (after the `d`) could be very challenging to the compiler.
>>> 
>>> I'm not sure it is. `let` and `case` are not valid in an expression, so an 
>>> `&&` followed by `let` or `case` must be joining clauses. On the other side 
>>> of things, Swift's `&&` doesn't ever produce an optional, so if we're 
>>> parsing an expression at the top level of an if-let, an `&&` must indicate 
>>> the end of the clause. An if-case *could* theoretically include an `&&`, 
>>> but pattern matching against a boolean value seems like a fairly useless 
>>> thing to do in a context that's specifically intended to test booleans.
>> 
>> Let me answer in another way that speaks to my background which isn't in 
>> compiler theory: The use of && may produce cognitive overload between the 
>> use in Boolean assertions and the use in separating condition clauses.
>> 
> 
> +1  the focus is should not transfer from the conditions to the separator 
> which happens to me with &&
> 
> I hope the core team pulls rank, even recasting this as adressing a bug in 
> the original grammar, to push it in. Worst case scenario is people ignore it 
> until they start needing it.
> 
> 
>> -- E
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-evolution mailing list
>> swift-evolution@swift.org
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution@swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to