> On May 28, 2016, at 10:18 AM, Matthew Johnson <matt...@anandabits.com> wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Given the whole newline groundswell that has emerged on SE, I did consider
>>> it but when I mocked up examples, it felt less readable and I suspect it
>>> would negatively affect the clarity of parsing this proposal aims to
>>> introduce.
>>>
>>> I'd really like to see a separate newline-as-separator proposal brought
>>> forward and formally reviewed. It's garnered a few very vocal supporters
>>> but it really doesn't fall under the umbrella of this proposal. I'd like
>>> the matter to be settled one way or the other for the sake of closure.
>>
>>
>> I agree that this could be positioned as a subsequent additional proposal.
>> I’d personally be fine with looping this into the original proposal, but I’m
>> also happy to split it out if you'd prefer Erica,
>
> If Erica isn't comfortable including it in this proposal I will be happy to
> drive a follow-up proposal.
>
> If we go that direction, would you want to see it focused exclusively on
> condition clauses or generalized to include comma separators in collection
> literals (and maybe argument lists?).
I’d prefer to keep it focused on guard conditions, since they seem precedented
by our handling of brace statements (which is already a sequence of
expressions, statements, and let decls mixed together). Collection literals
seem like a separable discussion.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
