Sent from my iPad
> On May 28, 2016, at 12:33 PM, Chris Lattner <clatt...@apple.com> wrote: > > >> On May 28, 2016, at 10:18 AM, Matthew Johnson <matt...@anandabits.com> wrote: >> >>>> >>>> Given the whole newline groundswell that has emerged on SE, I did consider >>>> it but when I mocked up examples, it felt less readable and I suspect it >>>> would negatively affect the clarity of parsing this proposal aims to >>>> introduce. >>>> >>>> I'd really like to see a separate newline-as-separator proposal brought >>>> forward and formally reviewed. It's garnered a few very vocal supporters >>>> but it really doesn't fall under the umbrella of this proposal. I'd like >>>> the matter to be settled one way or the other for the sake of closure. >>> >>> >>> I agree that this could be positioned as a subsequent additional proposal. >>> I’d personally be fine with looping this into the original proposal, but >>> I’m also happy to split it out if you'd prefer Erica, >> >> If Erica isn't comfortable including it in this proposal I will be happy to >> drive a follow-up proposal. >> >> If we go that direction, would you want to see it focused exclusively on >> condition clauses or generalized to include comma separators in collection >> literals (and maybe argument lists?). > > I’d prefer to keep it focused on guard conditions, since they seem > precedented by our handling of brace statements (which is already a sequence > of expressions, statements, and let decls mixed together). Collection > literals seem like a separable discussion. Sounds good. Let's see what Erica says. If she doesn't want to roll it in I'll get a draft of a proposal together right away. > > -Chris
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
