> On Jun 11, 2016, at 2:31 PM, Thorsten Seitz <tseit...@icloud.com> wrote:
>
>
>>> Am 11.06.2016 um 14:23 schrieb Brent Royal-Gordon <br...@architechies.com>:
>>>
>>> The only magic would be that all type definitions (`protocol` etc.) which
>>> do not give a supertype they conform to, will implicitly conform to `Any`,
>>> i.e.
>>>
>>> protocol Foo { … }
>>>
>>> means
>>>
>>> protocol Foo : Any { … }
>>
>> Any is also the supertype of all structural types, and structural types
>> cannot conform to protocols.
>
> AFAIK Swift does not support structural types and I am not sure whether we
> should change that. In that case `Any` would become magic, yes.
Hmmm poor tuples... I thought they did a good job as swift's structural type.
>
> -Thorsten
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
