Use protocols
{get}
Can be used for let
{get set}
Can be used for var
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 1:16 AM Benjamin Spratling via swift-evolution <
swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
> Howdy,
> Thanks, I’ll consider this as an alternative.
> I don’t see that this solves the issues of whether a property on a
> class is let, however.
> -Ben
>
> > On Dec 14, 2016, at 11:41 PM, Derrick Ho <wh1pch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > You might be able to ensure access modifiers by using protocols.
> >
> > If you want to ensure that a class has a property called foo that is
> private you can make a private protocol that specifies a private property
> called foo.
> >
> > This isn't a XCTest but it is a compile time check. If a programmer
> tries to change a private property to public then the the compiler will
> complain.
> >
> > The same can be done with final. Make a protocol with a static method.
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution@swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
