Can we also add mention that default arguments on subscripts should work as 
well? This will force whoever implements this to do it properly and rip out the 
old RValue-based argument tuple emission that’s only used for subscripts in 
favor the argument emission logic.

Slava

> On Jan 19, 2017, at 1:39 PM, Douglas Gregor via swift-evolution 
> <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
> 
> Hello Swift community,
> 
> The review of SE-0148 “Generic Subscripts" begins now and runs through 
> January 24, 2017. The proposal is available here:
> 
> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0148-generic-subscripts.md
>  
> <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/NNNN-proposal.md>
> Reviews are an important part of the Swift evolution process. All reviews 
> should be sent to the swift-evolution mailing list at
> 
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution 
> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution>
> or, if you would like to keep your feedback private, directly to the review 
> manager. When replying, please try to keep the proposal link at the top of 
> the message:
> 
> Proposal link:
> 
> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0148-generic-subscripts.md
>  
> <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/NNNN-proposal.md>
> Reply text
> 
> Other replies
>  <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution#what-goes-into-a-review-1>What 
> goes into a review?
> 
> The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review 
> through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of 
> Swift. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to 
> answer in your review:
> 
> What is your evaluation of the proposal?
> Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to 
> Swift?
> Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift?
> If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar feature, how do 
> you feel that this proposal compares to those?
> How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or 
> an in-depth study?
> More information about the Swift evolution process is available at
> 
> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/process.md 
> <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/process.md>
> Thank you,
> 
> -Doug
> 
> Review Manager
> 
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution@swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to