https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0148-generic-subscripts.md
> • What is your evaluation of the proposal? +1 Enthousiastic! > • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change > to Swift? Yes, because library developers are required to declare generic methods, even when a subscript would look and feel more natural at the call site. > • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift? Yes, because consistency simplifies the language: there was no good reason for subscripts not te be generic, except implementation details of the Swift compiler. I'll use the same arguments to support throwing subscripts. > • If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar feature, > how do you feel that this proposal compares to those? No, I don't. > • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick > reading, or an in-depth study? I've been waiting this for years, for the SQLite library http://github.com/groue/GRDB.swift Cheers, Gwendal _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution