Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 17, 2017, at 17:45, Joe Groff <jgr...@apple.com> wrote: > > • What is your evaluation of the proposal? Overall, a big +1 I'll 2nd not deprecating the BitwiseOperations protocol, though. > • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to > Swift? Yes > • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift? Yes > • If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar feature, > how do you feel that this proposal compares to those? N/A > • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, > or an in-depth study? I followed the thread pretty closely. - Dave Sweeris _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
Re: [swift-evolution] [swift-evolution-announce] [Re-Review] SE-0104: Protocol-oriented integers
David Sweeris via swift-evolution Fri, 17 Feb 2017 21:31:58 -0800
- [swift-evolution] [Re-Review] SE-010... Joe Groff via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-evolution] [Re-Revie... Xiaodi Wu via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-evolution] [Re-R... Hugo Hennies via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-evolution] [... Max Moiseev via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-evolution] [swift-ev... David Sweeris via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-evolution] [Re-Revie... Haravikk via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-evolution] [Re-Revie... Matthew Johnson via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-evolution] [Re-Revie... Karl Wagner via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-evolution] [Re-R... Max Moiseev via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-evolution] [... Patrick Pijnappel via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-evolutio... Max Moiseev via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-evo... Xiaodi Wu via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-evolution] [... Karl Wagner via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-evolutio... Xiaodi Wu via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-evolutio... Max Moiseev via swift-evolution