Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 19, 2017, at 10:28 AM, Adrian Zubarev
> <adrian.zuba...@devandartist.com> wrote:
>
> I really feel I’m blind, I cannot find it. Is the access modifier of open
> protocol *members* on open/public classes public by default, or open?
>
> If open, can we downgrade it to public in an open class?
I didn't specifically address members of open classes but did address open
classes. This proposal does not have any impact of the visibility of members
of open classes that conform to a public (nonopen) protocol, including the
default.
>
>
> --
> Adrian Zubarev
> Sent with Airmail
>
> Am 19. Februar 2017 um 17:16:59, Matthew Johnson (matt...@anandabits.com)
> schrieb:
>
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Feb 19, 2017, at 10:11 AM, Adrian Zubarev
>> <adrian.zuba...@devandartist.com> wrote:
>>
>>> @Matthew: Have you considered what happens with the access modifier of an
>>> open protocol when an open/public class conforms to it?
>>>
>>
>> Yes I covered this in the detailed design section of the proposal.
>>> // Module A
>>> open protocol A {
>>> func foo()
>>> }
>>>
>>> // Module B
>>> open class B : A {
>>> (open or public) func foo() {}
>>> // If `open`, can we downgrade to `public`?
>>> // The other way around seems straightforward
>>> }
>
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
