On Mar 11, 2017, at 12:20 PM, David Sweeris via swift-evolution <swift-evolution@swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org>> wrote:
> >> On Mar 11, 2017, at 12:57 AM, Jean-Daniel via swift-evolution >> <swift-evolution@swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org>> wrote: >> >> -1 >> >> It would be inconsistent to allow it for deterministic literals (String) and >> not for non deterministic literal (int which can be either a Int, Uint, >> Float, …) > > If I’m not mistaken, even with `bar = “baz”`, `String` is merely the default > inferred type. It could be anything that conforms to > `ExpressibleByStringLiteral`, right? In that regard, this is kinda just a way > to make a function implicitly generic: > func foo(bar = "baz") {…} > becomes: > func foo<T: ExpressibleByStringLiteral>(bar: T = "baz") {…} > As I understood it, omitting the type would work identically to `let` declarations. A string literal without a type defaults to `String`. Treating it as a generic function is a bad idea IMO. I don't think this sugar is worth any amount of added complexity. Most function arguments will have not have default values and this have to continue to declare the type, so this would only be more concise in very few cases. I'd prefer the consistency of always having to explicitly declare the argument type at a function boundary. To call a function, you need to know what type to pass in. This becomes more difficult when not make explicit, particularly when a more complicated expression is used as a default. -1 > Is there anything we can do with a variable, if all we know of it is that it > conforms to `ExpressibleByStringLiteral`? I can’t think of anything… If we > had a way to get back the literal string which the variable was initialized > with, we could initialize other values with that, but the protocol doesn’t > require us to store it. Come to think of it, is there even a way to store a > literal value in its “untyped” form? You can declare a variable to of type > `IntegerLiteralType`, but the type system then treats it as an `Int`. > > So while it looks nice (to me, anyway) I’m not sure you could actually do > anything with it. Or am I looking at this wrong? > > - Dave Sweeris > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > swift-evolution@swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org> > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution > <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution>
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
