Re: [swift-evolution] [Proposal] Nested extensions

[Tino Heth via swift-evolution]

> The current rules in SE-0025 state that the access modifier in front of the 
> extension states both the default and the maximum allowed visibility. This is 
> what I was trying to change.
Oh dear!
But afaics, SE-0025 is not to blame for all those complications, and many 
problems have a different origin… did you encounter any serious counter 
arguments to reduce the rules for access modifiers on extensions to "it sets 
the default for all entities contained in the extension"?
I think I'll do a PR despite those issues — changing the rules to allow nesting 
wasn't accepted, but maybe introduce nesting to change the rules works out ;-)
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution