Oh pardon, on the first glance I didn’t realized the issue with that example.
Here is an updated example that would work: let (first, second: (x, y)): (first: Int, second: (x: Int, y: Int)) = tuple This should work right? It’s assigning the inner tuple to second while also creating two additional constants from the inner tuple. I know this is redundant and can be used as second.x, but this should work like right, because it’s nested tuple destructuring? If we’d use var instead of let then x would contain the value assigned from the inner tuple, but it would be completely independent from the new second tuple variable. -- Adrian Zubarev Sent with Airmail Am 5. Mai 2017 um 08:04:07, Xiaodi Wu (xiaodi...@gmail.com) schrieb: let (first: a, second: (x: b, y: c)): (first: Int, second: (x: Int, y: Int)) = tuple // fine, unaffected This would be banned. You are using labels (things ending with a colon) in a pattern (the stuff that comes after the word "let").
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
