I’m aware what a label is, I just had a small misunderstanding about nested 
destructuring. ;-)

Issue solved for me.

let (a, b /* inner tuple */) = tuple

let (_, (x, y)) = tuple
+1 I don’t mind this change at all.



-- 
Adrian Zubarev
Sent with Airmail

Am 5. Mai 2017 um 08:14:10, Xiaodi Wu (xiaodi...@gmail.com) schrieb:

On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Adrian Zubarev 
<adrian.zuba...@devandartist.com> wrote:
Oh pardon, on the first glance I didn’t realized the issue with that example.

Here is an updated example that would work:

let (first, second: (x, y)): (first: Int, second: (x: Int, y: Int)) = tuple
This should work right?

No, again, this would be banned. You are using a label (a thing that ends in a 
colon) inside a tuple pattern (a thing between parenthesis that comes after 
"let").
 
It’s assigning the inner tuple to second while also creating two additional 
constants from the inner tuple. I know this is redundant and can be used as 
second.x, but this should work like right, because it’s nested tuple 
destructuring? If we’d use var instead of let then x would contain the value 
assigned from the inner tuple, but it would be completely independent from the 
new second tuple variable.



-- 
Adrian Zubarev
Sent with Airmail

Am 5. Mai 2017 um 08:04:07, Xiaodi Wu (xiaodi...@gmail.com) schrieb:

let (first: a, second: (x: b, y: c)): (first: Int, second: (x: Int, y: Int)) = 
tuple // fine, unaffected
This would be banned. You are using labels (things ending with a colon) in a 
pattern (the stuff that comes after the word "let").

_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to