> On May 11, 2017, at 8:47 PM, T.J. Usiyan <griotsp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> "a closure expression which is immediately caled,"

Thanks, fixed.  (To be clear, that proposal is not part of SE-0163.)

John.

>  
> 
> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 6:32 PM, John McCall via swift-evolution 
> <swift-evolution@swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org>> wrote:
>> On May 11, 2017, at 6:08 PM, Nevin Brackett-Rozinsky via swift-evolution 
>> <swift-evolution@swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org>> wrote:
>> 
>> Looks good at first glance.
>> 
>> Is there a diff showing what’s changed though?
> 
> This seems to work:
> 
>   
> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/compare/4cbb1f1fa836496d4bfba95c4b78a9754690956d...master#diff-e04958ae62d5b65cb356dfe928b24837
>  
> <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/compare/4cbb1f1fa836496d4bfba95c4b78a9754690956d...master#diff-e04958ae62d5b65cb356dfe928b24837>
> 
> (Ignore the changes to other files.)
> 
> John.
> 
>> 
>> Nevin
>> 
>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 5:39 PM, John McCall via swift-evolution 
>> <swift-evolution@swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org>> wrote:
>> Hello Swift Community,
>> 
>> The review of SE-0163: "String Revision: Collection Conformance, C Interop, 
>> Transcoding" begins now and runs through May 15th, 2017.
>> 
>> The first version of this proposal was accepted with revisions. The proposed 
>> revisions were just a few additions that were publicly requested and agreed 
>> to during the first review, and this would not normally require a full 
>> second review. However, as we worked to implement the proposal, several 
>> minor naming changes suggested themselves that had not been previously 
>> discussed. The Core Team felt that the most conscientious approach would be 
>> to submit the whole proposal for a short re-review.
>> 
>> The most noticeable change is that the Core Team feels StringProtocol would 
>> be a better name for the protocol unifying String and Substring. Unicode was 
>> felt to be slightly intimidating. Not using Unicode as the protocol name 
>> also has the benefit of allowing it to be used as a namespace to house 
>> Unicode-related types.
>> The proposal is available here:
>> 
>> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0163-string-revision-1.md
>>  
>> <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0163-string-revision-1.md>
>> Reviews are an important part of the Swift evolution process. All reviews 
>> should be sent to the swift-evolution mailing list at:
>> 
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution 
>> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution>
>> or, if you would like to keep your feedback private, directly to the review 
>> manager. 
>> 
>> When replying, please try to keep the proposal link at the top of the 
>> message:
>> 
>> Proposal link:
>> 
>> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0163-string-revision-1.md
>>  
>> <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0163-string-revision-1.md>
>> Reply text
>> 
>> Other replies
>> 
>>  <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution#what-goes-into-a-review-1>
>> What goes into a review?
>> 
>> The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review 
>> through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of 
>> Swift. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to 
>> answer in your review:
>> 
>> What is your evaluation of the proposal?
>> Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to 
>> Swift?
>> Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift?
>> If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar feature, how do 
>> you feel that this proposal compares to those?
>> How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or 
>> an in-depth study?
>> More information about the Swift evolution process is available at:
>> 
>> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/process.md 
>> <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/process.md>
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> John McCall
>> Review Manager
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-evolution mailing list
>> swift-evolution@swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org>
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution 
>> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution>
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-evolution mailing list
>> swift-evolution@swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org>
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution 
>> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution@swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org>
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution 
> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution>
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to