> On Sep 29, 2017, at 10:42 AM, Xiaodi Wu via swift-evolution > <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: > > Vladimir, I agree with you on that change, but it’s a separate topic from > this one. > > Tony is absolutely correct that this topic has already been discussed. It is > a deliberate design decision that public types do not automatically expose > members without explicit access modifiers; this has been brought up on this > list, and it is clearly not in scope for discussion as no new insight can > arise this late in the game. The inconsistency with public extensions was > brought up, the proposed solution was to remove modifiers for extensions, but > this proposal was rejected. So, the final design is what we have.
Agreed. The core team would only consider a refinement or change to access control if there were something actively broken that mattered for ABI stability. -Chris _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
