> On Nov 6, 2017, at 4:33 PM, Slava Pestov via swift-evolution > <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Right now, the following two declarations are equivalent: > > struct S { > var x: Int? > } > > struct S { > var x: Int? = nil > } > > That is, mutable bindings of sugared optional type (but not Optional<T>!) > always have a default value of ‘nil’. This feature increases the surface area > of the language for no good reason, and I would like to deprecate it in > -swift-version 5 with a short proposal. Does anyone feel strongly about > giving it up? I suspect most Swift users don’t even know it exists.
I don’t have too strong an opinion on this, leaning towards being supportive. That said, I think you underestimate the source breakage it will cause. I have seen a lot of code this change will break (albeit in a trivial way that’s easy to migrate). > > Slava > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > swift-evolution@swift.org > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution