Same here, but I wouldn’t care much if it were gone.
Am 7. November 2017 um 21:40:56, David Hart via swift-evolution
(swift-evolution@swift.org) schrieb:
Yeah, I use the first form constantly.
> On 6 Nov 2017, at 23:33, Slava Pestov via swift-evolution
> <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Right now, the following two declarations are equivalent:
>
> struct S {
> var x: Int?
> }
>
> struct S {
> var x: Int? = nil
> }
>
> That is, mutable bindings of sugared optional type (but not Optional<T>!)
> always have a default value of ‘nil’. This feature increases the surface area
> of the language for no good reason, and I would like to deprecate it in
> -swift-version 5 with a short proposal. Does anyone feel strongly about
> giving it up? I suspect most Swift users don’t even know it exists.
>
> Slava
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution@swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
