+1 for the proposal Ondrej Barina
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 3:16 PM, BJ Homer via swift-evolution < swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: > > > On Dec 5, 2017, at 7:06 AM, Tino Heth via swift-evolution < > swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: > > > Also, I don’t think anything can prevent all abuses (it’s an subjective > classification anyways) — people might just use PyVals because dynamic > behavior, and that would imho be a huge abuse. > > > Can you give an example of how someone would use such a PyVal to do > something other than interoperate with Python? I’m having trouble imagining > what your concern is. > > Specifically in the case of PyVal, I imagine it would already be > hard-coded to call into Python for any dynamic lookup, so I don’t see how > one could use “just use PyVal because dynamic behavior”. Are you saying > that someone would just write all their code in a Python library, and then > call into it from Swift? > > -BJ > > > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > swift-evolution@swift.org > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution > >
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
