Pascal Gloor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-06-07: [snip] > This is the normal routed case. I think this is what Daniel was > looking for.
Not quite, but oh never mind. The point I was trying to make is the fact that vtx engineers explained to a customer that he would not be able to assign *any* address of his /30 subnet to a server behind his ADSL router because all of the subnet would be consumed by the link from the LNS to the ADSL router (I guess this hasn't come across too well from my message). It seems nobody can imagine how this is supposed to be the case, so I guess that confirms that it's probably bogus information. Thanks anyway for all responses! Cheers Dan -- Daniel Roethlisberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
