nearly same story as sdsl before, VTX used 2 IP out of the customer /29 range for the wan link. Traceroute looked funny, not to mention how that "improved" icmp Trouble
Cheers ... Am 8 Jun 2007 um 1:09 hat Daniel Roethlisberger geschrieben: Date sent: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 01:09:56 +0200 From: Daniel Roethlisberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [swinog] vtx ADSL /30 subnet practice Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:swinog- [EMAIL PROTECTED]> <mailto:swinog- [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Pascal Gloor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-06-07: > [snip] > > This is the normal routed case. I think this is what Daniel was > > looking for. > > Not quite, but oh never mind. The point I was trying to make is the > fact that vtx engineers explained to a customer that he would not be > able to assign *any* address of his /30 subnet to a server behind his > ADSL router because all of the subnet would be consumed by the link from > the LNS to the ADSL router (I guess this hasn't come across too well > from my message). > > It seems nobody can imagine how this is supposed to be the case, so I > guess that confirms that it's probably bogus information. Thanks anyway > for all responses! > > Cheers > Dan > > -- > Daniel Roethlisberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > _______________________________________________ > swinog mailing list > swinog@lists.swinog.ch > http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog csdatabrasil Ltda. Roger Schmid Rua Arquiteto Luiz Nunes 186 Imbiribeira CEP: 51170-430 Recife/ PE BR +55 81 3422 1714 US: +1 360 515 33 80 CH: +41 32 5110858 UK: +44 8444845331 VOIP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<<attachment: linha.jpg>>
_______________________________________________ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog