Andre

I take it you mean that RFC1918 or other bogons that are not assigned by
IANA to any registry are okay to filter vs assigned/allocated IP space
to/from the registeries should not be filtered.

Thomas

----- Original Message -----
From: "Andre Oppermann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 8:33 AM
Subject: [swinog] Filtering the backbone is BAD!!! Don't do it!!!


> Hello all,
>
> please stop any filtering in the IP backbones! It wreks havroc the
> whole thing. If you do any filtering, then do it on the access network
> gateways to the backbone!
>
> I'm getting really pissed that more and more upstreams are filtering
> their entire backbones without telling anyone (not even their ISP
> customers) and without updating the filters all the time!!! :-(
>
> Who are the bad guys? I know that Sunrise, IP-Plus and COLT are
> filtering. Anyone else?
>
> Look at this. I wanted to access the site of an DivX alternative and
> got this:
>
> # ping www.3ivx.com
> PING 3ivx.com (207.228.238.29): 56 data bytes
> 36 bytes from filter-for-online-gambling-sites-and-RFC1918-addr.zrh1.ch.
> colt.net (212.23.224.56): Destination Host Unreachable
> Vr HL TOS  Len   ID Flg  off TTL Pro  cks      Src      Dst
>  4  5  00 5400 487b   0 0000  3e  01 adb9 212.23.244.90  207.228.238.29
>
>
> --
> Andre
> ----------------------------------------------
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/

----------------------------------------------
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/

Reply via email to