hi kurt again :)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of Kurt A. Schumacher
> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:08 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [swinog] Mailempfang wegen SPAM blockiert / Mail receipt
> because of Spam blocks
>
>
> Feel free and rent your fixed IP address or even better some rack
> space and
> bandwidth at your favorite ISP (bet most of the peoples on this list have
> plenty...) - and you can perfectly run your private mail server - and even
> block SPAM coming in over 100Mb/1G Ethernet long before traveling the
> bandwidth-limited channel home.

well, a spammer could loose their machine. imagine if furst would rent a
rack ;-)
then you could get him personally ;-) *need to find baseball*

> Sorry, this is NO REASON to run a mail server behind a dial-up IP line.
> That's a children's solution for wantobecracksorselfdesignatedexperts -
> roughly how my children (2nd Kindergarten and 2nd class) are playing with
> SMTP/POP/IMAP servers these days.

companies using exchange & isdn routers ? -> get every 1-2 hours online for
10minutes, get all mails, send all mails?
there are sill companies that don't want to buy adsl/cable/whatever. try to
convince their management ;-)

> PS. Most (imho good...) WLAN providers are running Nomadix (and similar)
> engines, redirecting SMTP, HTTP and similar traffic to their designated
> (proxy/relay) servers, ignoring the customer client system settings.

for that you don't need a nomadix. cisco policy routing can do the same. and
as you're (for almost sure) using cisco in your network, you don't have to
buy new machines ;-)

-steven

----------------------------------------------
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/

Reply via email to