Pascal,
I think bigger companies should be able to send all these people as long as there are no other companies not being able to attend because of them.
The amount of people not working in that company shouldn't be your/our problem.
On the other hand i propose to set a limit as soon as we really need one.
Cheers,
Günti
(also from a bigger company...)
|-----Original Message-----
|From: Pascal Gloor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|Sent: Dienstag, 10. Februar 2004 12:35
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: [swinog] SwiNOG #8 update (agenda & registration)
|
|
|Dear SwiNOGers,
|
|[AGENDA]
|
|After a long and hard work, we can finally publish the
|definitive SwiNOG-8
|meeting agenda.
|
|http://www.swinog.ch/meetings/swinog8/swinog8_agenda-txt.txt
|
|
|[REGISTRATION]
|
|We're always trying to allow everyone to join the meeting. In
|the past it
|happended once that we had to closed the registration. We would like to
|avoid such things to happen. Therefor, I kindly ask anyone who
|cannot attend
|to the meeting to let me know as soon as possible.
|
|Number of participant per company:
|
|We have been discussing about this subject in the past on the
|mailing list.
|As far as I remember we have agreed that people join in their
|own name and
|not in the name of their company.
|BUT
|There's now a company with 11 registered people. I'm not sure
|the company
|itself will appreciate that, but that's not really my/our
|problem. I just
|wanted to point this out and open a discussion about it. On my point of
|view, even 5-6 ppl from the same company is ok, not sure about
|11. What do
|you think ?
|
|
|Regards,
|Pascal
|
|----------------------------------------------
|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
|http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
|
