My current convention is: [NCTM_GCB_Ephesians031] ^ ^ ^ ^ | | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | Book name | Author (Initials) Organisation
but, that's just me, (I'm, still developing them), and after the commentaries are done, and the licencing issues are worked out, then I was going to finalise it. Pierre Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > Eeli Kaikkonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I have one objection: "Systematic Theology" is too common a name. The >> module names should be differentiated from the start up. > > Well... OK. You don't find a problem with the Heretics or Orthodoxy > module names? They're not very well differentiated in 1 word, and > Chesterton is surely not the only one to have written on those > subjects. What about Institutes? > > It could be renamed e.g. HodgeSysTheo, but there surely seems to be a > strong bias in favor of really short module names -- consider the > Pilgrim and Practice modules. > > _______________________________________________ > sword-devel mailing list: [email protected] > http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: [email protected] http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
