The former - installing from each repository into a different folder. Does it require changes to front-ends? Yes, unless we push that behavior into the default construction of an SWMgr. Does that mean we should discount it in its entirety? I don't believe so.
The path to it is not the simplest, but I do believe it leaves us in a desirable position. --Greg On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Peter von Kaehne <ref...@gmx.net> wrote: > On Thu, 2015-09-03 at 08:54 -0500, Greg Hellings wrote: >> This is a proposal I've brought up multiple times in the past ... > >> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 8:08 AM, DM Smith <dmsm...@crosswire.org> >> wrote: >> > If we had each repository downloaded to its own folder, >> > >> > > On Sep 3, 2015, at 5:26 AM, Peter von Kaehne <ref...@gmx.net> >> > > wrote: >> > > Proposal: >> > > >> > > 1) Add a namespace element to ModuleName and datapath. In > > Greg, just for clarity - which of the two proposals are you endorsing? > > Former, which DM discounts himself would require changes in the > software, latter would make changes interesting and compelling in terms > of Abbreviation support, but not necessitate anything. > > Peter > > _______________________________________________ > sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org > http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page