On 02/21/2017 11:37 PM, Matt Zabojnik wrote: > know, I have no awareness of any sort of situation relating to the matter.
Let's put it this way: Other than official resources distributed by authorized agents of _The Sword Project_, _Accordance_, _BibleWorks_, and _Logos Library Systems_ (I've forgotten what they changed their name to), my working assumption is that the copyright data on any resource is, at best, inaccurate. In all instances it is mandatory to do due diligence. Obtain permission in writing. Corporate letterhead signed by the party that is authorized to give permission to third parties to utilize the material elsewhere, with the letter stating precisely what permissions are being given, and what the limitations on those permissions are. All of which is a round about way of saying your PD NASB either is not what it purports to be --- the NASB --- or else has been relicensed by somebody who lacked the legal authorization to do so, or neither the NASB, and was relicensed by somebody who lacked the legal authorization to do so. jonathon _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page