On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Ketan Padegaonkar <[email protected]> wrote: >> I can think of bumping the micro component of the version to make the >> version number 2.0.1.TIMESTAMP to get around this issue. Any other ideas ?
That's completely fine and the simplest solution imho. It's valid also. -- Cheers, Chris Aniszczyk http://aniszczyk.org +1 860 839 2465 _______________________________________________ swtbot-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/swtbot-dev
