Le 05/11/2010 09:10, Chris Aniszczyk a écrit :
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Ketan Padegaonkar <[email protected]> wrote:I can think of bumping the micro component of the version to make the version number 2.0.1.TIMESTAMP to get around this issue. Any other ideas ?That's completely fine and the simplest solution imho. It's valid also.
+1 _______________________________________________ swtbot-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/swtbot-dev
