> The manner in which the information is displayed is merely > eye candy, it makes it easier to read, but it is hardly necessary.
IMHO, that is silly. If that were the case, we'd be using a plain-text web, and people wouldn't be dumping lots of money at web design folks. 'Eyecandy' has a clear impact on usability. A quick look at some of the visual massacres on myspace proves my point better than any words could. > thusly I propose the wiki should be reduced to a > medium purely of information because there could surely be no way to > easily account for everyone's preferences in the way the data is > displayed. That seems to say that if we can't agree on 'one size fits exactly all' we should do without something. I think that's a bad strategy. If we can't agree on 'one size fits all' we get ''one size that fits a whole lot' and have something like user CSS for those few that need or want something else. - Far > ~Dave > The internet explorer and CSS developer > _______________________________________________ Sycamore-Dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.projectsycamore.org/ https://tools.cernio.com/mailman/listinfo/sycamore-dev
