Pierre Joye wrote: > >>> I think we ask the wrong question. I think the problem is not about >>> prefixes at all. It's about: >>> - usefulness >>> - opensourceness (?) >>> - quality >>> - documentation >>> - commitment (to maintain and evolve the plugin) >>> - tests > > All these points are correct (obviously...). However arguing that > having hundred of different (meaningless) prefix is a very dangerous > situation and brings nothing but confusions. Indeed we are talking > about one channel at a time (be the forge or in symfony itself). I > don't really see why it is so hard to understand. Many projects > already made this bad experience and they all took the choice of a > common prefix to avoid naming clashes and other bad side effects. Why > Symfony simply can't continue on the right way regarding the naming > convention?
Ok, I was not clear on my position: Let's keep sf prefix for all plugins. > > -- > Pierre > http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
