Fabien,

>> 
>> It seems the usage of the environments in config files is inconsistent.
>> Since the configuration cache is stored based on environment, is there any
>> reason to restrict certain files from not having support for environments? I
>> think configuration files like filters.yml and view.yml should be
>> customizable based on environment.
>> 
>> Also, there is some inconsistency with default/all. Can we change all to
>> default for consistency?
>> 
>> Also, what do you think about adding database manager as a factories.yml
>> factory?
> 
> After some thoughts, I don't think this is a good idea. As I said
> before, sfDatabaseManager is already an abstraction class. Moreover,
> this class is used at several places to initialize Propel. So, if you
> define your own class, a lot of things will break.
> 

I see what you mean. This suggestion was more about making all of the
factories customizable, rather needed for a real purpose.

>> There is a view_cache factory, but I think we should add a cache
>> factory as well (for internal caching ­ apc/xcache/eaccellerator) and
>> optimize some parts of the core to use apc/xcache (like caching the path
>> lookups for finding templates + configs, or caching routing)..
>> 
>> Also, is it just me or could the web debug timers use a refactor? (they seem
>> to always not add up)
>> 
>> Any thoughts / questions / concerns?
>> 
>> - Dustin
>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> > 



--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"symfony developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to