On Apr 12, 2:51 pm, Fabien Potencier <fabien.potenc...@symfony- project.com> wrote: > On 4/12/11 2:48 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: > > > On 12.04.2011, at 14:45, Fabien Potencier wrote: > > >> On 4/12/11 2:41 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: > >>> Hi, > > >>> So when I announced the decision to use the IRC meetings to finalize > >>> decisions for discussions that have matured to a state where little to no > >>> discussions are necessary during the IRC meeting, the idea of course > >>> wasn't to kill the IRC meetings. We have important topics that need to be > >>> pushed on and it seems that traffic on this list has dropped > >>> considerably. Most questions on this list seem to be user questions and > >>> not development related. > > >> That's good news to me. It probably means that we are almost done. > > >>> What do we want to do? > > >>> There are at least still two big topics still on the table: > >>> - API namespace [1] > > >> We don't do that at this point. > > > so what does this mean for translations? > > i guess given that so many wanted things to switch to keys, but nobody has > > produced code either means that nobody felt that their proposal would have > > a sufficiently high chance of being accepted or that its not such a biting > > issue after all? > > I still don't see why a few keys in the core is a problem. But I can see > why I don't want to add the complexity of a fake translation layer in > each component.
I obviously meant a few English sentences as keys of course. Fabien > Fabien > > > > > > > > > regards, > > Lukas Kahwe Smith > > [email protected] -- If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to security at symfony-project.com You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en
