On 21.04.2011, at 10:24, Bernhard Schussek wrote: > Without taking a deeper look at the matter here, I'm very much against > introduction of *Light bundles. If usage can be simplified, it should > be simplified in the core. Otherwise we end up with too many ways to > do the same thing.
We can support the "simple mode" in SecurityBundle too. Basically we would need to then first introspect the configuration if "simple mode" is enabled (or not disabled) by iterating over the configuration once and then switch to a different Configuration class depending on this. If we keep this all in one Configuration class we would have to relax/complicate the validation which isnt acceptable. Having a Light Bundle would get around this as the "flag" to enable simply mode would be the alias name in the app config. Anyway, as I begin to notice a pattern, where I seem to repeatedly attempt to explain that this isnt about duplication etc and everybody disagreeing I will stop here. If you all feel like documentation can solve the issue, then I concede. regards, Lukas Kahwe Smith [email protected] -- If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to security at symfony-project.com You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en
