At least this is my understanding of how Components should act like and 
what Symfony2 Standard/Composer are/should be for.

I see no reason why we couldn't have a release cycle for components like 
the one Microsoft has for the Windows updates, every second Tuesday of 
every month, in Microsoft's case, maybe we can do a every six week release 
cycle for small increments of Symfony2.X.Y this way?


Best regards,
Florin


On Friday, April 27, 2012 9:09:50 PM UTC+3, Fabien Potencier wrote:
>
> Hi all, 
>
> The Symfony 2.1 release was expected to be published some time ago and 
> we struggle with it for two main reasons: 
>
> * The number of contributions we have every single day. That's great but 
> it means that it is never a good time to release because of this last 
> minute great change that we want to merge first; 
>
> * The recent BC breaks in the form/validator components. 
>
> But basically, we cannot release 2.1 because of the second point. We 
> need to be sure that we only break BC for forms only once. So, we have 
> two options: 
>
> * Wait for the form component to stabilize (which means that we are 
> happy with the state of the API and that enough people have played with 
> it and are happy with the features) 
>
> * Release 2.1 as soon as possible (because we already have quite a few 
> nice enhancements). 
>
> I thought that the second option was do-able by forking master and 
> reverting some PRs related to the form component (the ones that actually 
> break BC and are not stable yet because of some bugs or regressions -- 
> surprisingly, we are not talking about many of them). 
>
> Many people think the contrary and so, I want to hear everybody's 
> opinion on this matter. 
>
> Let me reiterate the two possibilities here: 
>
> * Wait for the form component to stabilize: we can probably schedule 2.1 
> for August 2012. In the meantime, we should concentrate on the form 
> component and delay other big changes that can affect the stability of 
> the release. 
>
> * Release 2.1 as soon as possible. 
>
> Whatever we choose, I want to next Symfony 2 releases to have shorter 
> release cycles (a bit like what I do with Twig); and for that to happen, 
> we need to keep BC as much as possible so that people can upgrade to new 
> versions without any fear. 
>
> Fabien 
>
> -- 
> Fabien Potencier 
> Sensio CEO - Symfony lead developer 
> sensiolabs.com | symfony.com | fabien.potencier.org 
> Tél: +33 1 40 99 80 80 
>
>

-- 
If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to 
security at symfony-project.com

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "symfony developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en

Reply via email to