Comment #20 on issue 2252 by pr...@goodok.ru: activate docstring examples
for symarray()
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2252
Thanks, Aaron, for link pointing.
All test are passed (except the floppy issue 2258 in master).
The way which is chosen is to add `#doctest: +SKIP` for these reasons,
explained in commit message:
" Issue 2252 has some discussion on how to get the
examples to work with or without numpy but they are too convoluted and make
the examples hard to read. Since they are examples I consider it is more
important for them to be readable than to pass under doctest on a pure
python
env."
I just notice that the tests in doctrsing (either as doctrsing itself) have
a one of the aims to be generated for "SymPy Modules Reference" in SymPy
documentation.
An all directives are not included there. Therefore (my opinion) readable
reason is not so significant.
Nevertheless, formally, the current issue is complete.
Separate opinion regarding the GCoS:
This issue is easy, in spite of the some work with "numpy" variants
apparently have done. My opinion that it would be better for Luis Garcia to
implement a "numpy" handling, but as a separate issue.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" group.
To post to this group, send email to sympy-issues@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sympy-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sympy-issues?hl=en.
