On 30 нояб, 03:01, "Ondrej Certik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/11/30 Kirill Smelkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 30 нояб, 01:57, "Ondrej Certik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> 2008/11/29 Kirill Smelkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> > On 30 нояб, 00:38, "Ondrej Certik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> 2008/11/29 Kirill Smelkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> >> > On 29 нояб, 23:40, "Ondrej Certik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> >> On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 9:14 PM, Kirill Smelkov > >> >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> >> > On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 11:45:29PM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 11:34 PM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL > >> >> >> >> PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> >> >> > From: Kirill Smelkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> >> >> >> > .--. .--. > >> >> >> >> > ._' |/ :.-, > >> >> >> >> > | `'.-;-.;` .' > >> >> >> >> > _:._/.'.'.'\.`-. > >> >> >> >> > / \.'.'.'/ / > >> >> >> >> > '-._.;`'-'-';---' , /> > >> >> >> >> > jgs / /| \'-. \\/( > >> >> >> >> > `--' `-.-' `\|_.-' > >> >> >> >> > `\ > >> >> >> >> > ' > > >> >> >> >> Nice picture.
[...] > > Yes, I could get "crazy," or something, but don't you find it comedic, > > that it was me who brought this whole patch review thing into sympy? > > Indeed, it is pretty comedic, I remembered that you very disappointed > when I pushed in some patch without proper review (a year ago, when we > started to review patches) -- and you were absolutely right. And now > you pushed two patches without review. :) :) Something stayed in our memories for good. That's what the flower is devoted to. > > The whole question should be nothing project-wise -- one developer > > wants to leave, and he asks to please remove (or just removes himself) > > his credits and other info. If he does not affect other developers > > or code or anything else, for _any_ reason, to me I'd just let him go. > > >> So far > >> our credits lists were a list of all contributors. That's why I want > >> your name to be in. > > > It was your rule which was the default. And untill now everyone was ok > > with it. > > > Though it does not automatically mean this is true in the future. > > Exactly, that's why we discuss this, so that we can get input from the > whole community (or at least from people that want to express an > opinion on this), and find a solution that is fine with you, fine with > me and fine with everyone else. > > Anyway, I suggest to keep this question open for couple days and > calmly decide then with the input of others. Is that ok with you? Ok, though I don't understand why this is needed, let's do that. I'm here for one more couple of days, but I'm still saing "goodbye." Всего хорошего, Кирилл. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy-patches" group. To post to this group, send email to sympy-patches@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy-patches?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
