Jochen, any progress on this? Your patch is ready to merge in my opinion, if
you don't have have time to fix the docstrings, I'll do this trivial stuff.
:)

Vinzent

2009/5/20 Ondrej Certik <ond...@certik.cz>

>
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 4:15 AM, Vinzent Steinberg
> <vinzent.steinb...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > 2009/5/15 Jochen Voß <jochen.v...@googlemail.com>
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'll be travelling for a few days and will be able to send a new patch
> >> only sometimes next week.  What I suggest to do is:
> >>
> >> 1) Remove the "more stable" wording from the QRsolve docstring.
> >> 2) Add warnings to the both the LUsolve and the QRsolve docstrings,
> >> stating that these functions should not be used for real matrics (and
> >> point to mpmath instead).
> >> 3) Add one or more examples with symbolic matrices to the tests.
> >>
> >> Does this sound ok for everybody?
> >
> >
> > Yeah, this sounds very reasonable, let's do it.
> >
> > Have a nice journey!
>
> Please ping me if you have something ready for review/merge.
>
> Thanks,
> Ondrej
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sympy-patches" group.
To post to this group, send email to sympy-patches@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sympy-patches+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sympy-patches?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to