On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Fabian Pedregosa<fab...@fseoane.net> wrote:
>
> Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 7:05 AM, Vinzent
>> Steinberg<vinzent.steinb...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> I'd prefer
>>>
>>> """Handler for the absolute value."""
>>>
>>> (see PEP 257 [1]) over
>>>
>>> """handler for the absolute value"""
>>>
>>> but that's certainly not important. After all, most docstrings in sympy are
>>> not conforming to all these conventions.
>>> You could still leave the old information (before you made the docstrings
>>> consistent) there if you want.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure about putting all the logic in __init__.py. Isn't it supposed
>>> to have only the imports?
>>
>> There are no doctests for the functions in the refine module, and also
>> I would not use "from sympy import *", but rather import thigs
>> explicitely.  So I will have to fix it at some point in the future, so
>> I would prefer if you could do that now. :)
>
> All methods that are part of the user interface have docstring and
> doctests. I just see little benefit for making doctest for methods that
> are used internally (refine_Pow, refine_abs, etc.)

Ok. I'll do so myself then. The example doctests are really important,
both for users and for developers.

>
> I prefer to import * in the examples than "from sympy import Q, Symbol,
> Assume, sqrt, refine". After all, users will end up typing this in the
> terminal.

Well, I have a different opinion here, I think it will cause us
problems in the future, as it always did, if we used implicit imports.

But if you all think we should use implicit imports, we can do that too.

Ondrej

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sympy-patches" group.
To post to this group, send email to sympy-patches@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sympy-patches+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sympy-patches?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to