The failed assertion X<Y<Z should simply be removed. It fails because
of the platform-dependent hash, and is not relevant any more.
It used to be relevant when I tried to use the relation
[[A,B],C] + [[C,A],B] + [[B,C],A] = 0
to enforce a canonical nesting of commutators. I couldn't get it to
work properly, so I removed it but forgot to remove that test. Some
sort of canonical nesting of Commutators would be cool...
Øyvind
ma., 23.11.2009 kl. 13.54 -0800, skrev Ondrej Certik:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Ondrej Certik <ond...@certik.cz> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Ondrej Certik <ond...@certik.cz> wrote:
> >> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 2:10 PM, jegerjensen <jensen.oyv...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I know you guys are busy... But do you have an approximate schedule
> >>> for when the patches may go into trunk?
> >>>
> >>> Ondrej, do you disagree with the previous posts?
> >>
> >> I agree with previous posts. The patches can go in immediately once
> >> someone writes the docstrings for the rest of the methods.
> >> Unfortunately I can't find time to do so myself now. I rebased the
> >> patches on top of the latest master and pushed into wick4 branch at
> >>
> >> git://github.com/certik/sympy.git
> >>
> >> The current status is:
> >>
> >> $ bin/coverage_doctest.py sympy/physics/secondquant.py
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> sympy/physics/secondquant.py
> >>
> >> Missing documentation:
> >> * canonize(cls, arg)
> >> * eval(cls, arg)
> >> * wrap_tuples(*args, **kw_args)
> >> * symbol(self)
> >> * upper(self)
> >> * lower(self)
> >> * doit(self, **kw_args)
> >> * eval(cls, i, j)
> >> * indices_contain_equal_information(self)
> >> * is_symbolic(self)
> >> * apply_operator(self, state)
> >> * apply_operator(self, state)
> >> * apply_operator(self, state)
> >> * apply_operator(self, state)
> >> * apply_operator(self, state)
> >> * up(self, i)
> >> * down(self, i)
> >> * split_commutative_parts(m)
> >> * canonize(cls, bra, ket)
> >> * eval(cls, bra, ket)
> >> * bra(self)
> >> * ket(self)
> >> * index(self, state)
> >> * state(self, i)
> >> * index(self, state)
> >> * state(self, i)
> >> * doit(self,**hints)
> >> * doit(self, **kw_args)
> >> * iter_q_annihilators(self)
> >> * iter_q_creators(self)
> >>
> >>
> >> Missing doctests:
> >> * eval(cls,symbol, upper, lower)
> >> * doit(self,**kw_args)
> >> * apply_Mul(m)
> >> * apply_operators(e)
> >> * matrix_rep(op, basis)
> >> * move(e, i, d)
> >> * eval(cls, a,b)
> >> * eval(cls,arg)
> >>
> >> SCORE sympy/physics/secondquant.py: 44% (31 of 69)
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>
> >> Since nobody wants to work on this and I really want this code to be
> >> in, let me commit myself to finish the docstrings myself by the end of
> >> this week.
> >
> > I also got the following two failures:
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________________________
> > _________________ sympy/core/tests/test_functions.py:test_doit
> > _________________
> > File "/home/ondrej/repos/sympy/sympy/core/tests/test_functions.py",
> > line 342, in test_doit
> > assert d.doit() == 12
> > AssertionError
> > ________________________________________________________________________________
> > ___________ sympy/physics/tests/test_secondquant.py:test_commutation
> > ___________
> > File "/home/ondrej/repos/sympy/sympy/physics/tests/test_secondquant.py",
> > line 270, in test_commutation
> > assert X<Y<Z
> > AssertionError
> >
> > tests finished: 1686 passed, 2 failed, 9 skipped, 39 xfailed, 1
> > xpassed in 123.85 seconds
> > DO *NOT* COMMIT!
> >
> > so those will have to be fixed as well.
>
> E.g. I might have introduced that by rebasing your patches, there were
> some conflicts in the Derivative.doit().
>
> In any case, so the plan is:
>
> 1) the above two failures have to be fixed
> 2) docstrings finished
>
> Once this is done, we'll push the patches in. The 2) is not a big deal
> and I will do so myself, all you have to do is to run it in a terminal
> and write a few examples. First of course you have to figure out how
> to actually use the code in the first place, but I think that will not
> be a big deal either hopefully. So I'll do 2). Any help with 1) is
> appreciated.
>
> Ondrej
>
> --
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "sympy-patches" group.
> To post to this group, send email to sympy-patc...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> sympy-patches+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/sympy-patches?hl=.
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-patches" group.
To post to this group, send email to sympy-patc...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sympy-patches+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sympy-patches?hl=.
